Tatiana Chiaradia and Victoria Salles discuss the modulation of the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision that allowed rescission actions in accordance with Theme 69, in an article for ConJur

Para mais notícias e artigos,

Our partner Tatiana Del Giudice Cappa Chiaradia and our lawyer Victoria Salles have written an article, published in Revista Consultor Jurídico (ConJur), which addresses a new chapter on the modulation of effects, following the decision of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) that allowed for a rescission action in the adequacy of Theme 69. The measure has sparked a debate on the effectiveness of res judicata and the limits of rescission actions.

‘The STF plenary revisited the jurisprudence on the Thesis of the Century and allowed the filing of rescission actions to adapt judgments that had already become final to the new rules established by the Supreme Court, which recognised the right of taxpayers to exclude ICMS from the PIS/Cofins calculation bases. The judgement on Theme 69 represented a victory for taxpayers in 2017, but the STF modulated its effects in 2021, limiting the application of the decision to March 2017. In practice, only taxpayers who had filed lawsuits before March 2017 were able to recover what had been paid in the five years prior to the distribution of the lawsuits.’

Read more: https://lnkd.in/da-Kh5Bf

IFIX ignores Copom meeting and rises with the prospect of a tax cut for FIIs

Alamy Candido shares his experience of planning, governance and transparency during inheritance succession

News

Financial sector wants vetoes overturned to prevent taxation of funds in tax reform

News

Real Estate Holding: what to expect with the Tax Reform (Complementary Law 214/2025)

News

saiba antes

Cadastre-se para receber a nossa newsletter